Originally posted by ArtistFormerlyKnownAsBKR
View Post
And most of the people on this forum, believing that Peterson is a child abuser, appear to have a slightly higher opinion of him than they do of Phillips. IMO, in both cases posters have allowed their negative passions about those players to cloud their judgment.
Now, with respect to Panama's post, I challenged the assertion that Ingram is a better player for us than Phillips ever was. And you, yourself said it--Phillips used to be a more effective and disruptive player earlier in his career. I agree, which is why I don't think a guy that has only played 22 games for us with most of those coming as a rookie has quite reached that level yet.
I definitely think Ingram has the potential to surpass what Phillips was for us at his best, but that he has not done so yet. Is that really that controversial of an opinion to have?
Comment