Originally posted by QSmokey
View Post
Chargers claim DT Drake Nevis
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by oneinchpunch View PostDisagree. While Starks was low risk, in a rebuild, I would rather see Drake Nevis type players brought in. Guys that are young and might have a future with the team. Not guys that are one year bandaids that should be retiredLife is too short to drink cheap beer :beer:
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by SDfan View PostAccording to Chargers front office- they are not rebuilding. They expect to to win this year with patchwork roster. Add depth and talent as the years and drafts come and go.Hashtag thepowderblues
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by oneinchpunch View PostDisagree. While Starks was low risk, in a rebuild, I would rather see Drake Nevis type players brought in. Guys that are young and might have a future with the team. Not guys that are one year bandaids that should be retired
By the way, I'm perplexed as to why they cut Nevis so quickly.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by QSmokey View PostConsidering that he was a stop-gap, I see no harm. I also thought - at worst - that he'd be good for depth. I was wrong on both counts. Bottom line: He cost the team lunch money, and there didn't seem to be a younger alternative with upside floating around out there. There still isn't.
By the way, I'm perplexed as to why they cut Nevis so quickly.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment