Originally posted by Topcat
View Post
At present? His trading doesn't stand out. At all. It's pedestrian. Not nickname worthy. (Unless you-- you know-- have a 'nickname fetish') Hortiz' declining to trade (down from #5) has been FAR more impactful on the building of this team, and you blow completely past that, and on to a tangential point. You, sir, are Hacksaw!
If Joe's impact/freq. of trades doesn't stand out from OTHER general managers-- and it DOESN'T-- how does that qualify as meriting a trait-based ("Trader!!!") nickname like the one you absolutely INSIST that he wear?!? It DOESN'T! Unless you're Hacksaw, of course, in which case... it's just what you do, "I'm Lee 'Hacksaw' Hamilton, and I demand that you pay attention to ME, whether I make sense or not! You're not listening?!? I'LL YELL LOUDER!!! La Mesa! Reaction!" You, sir, are Hacksaw!
YOUR defense is, "Well, he made a couple of puny trades, so it's not dishonest to call him 'Trader'." Not dishonest in the technical sense, sure. But by *that* standard, YOU should be calling 85% of NFL GMs 'Trader Bob' or 'Trader Carl' or 'Trader Tom' because, hey! They made a trade! It's a prototypical Hacksaw-like bending of perspective to fit a completely oblique narrative. You sir, are Hacksaw!
Dude, you are *SO* Hacksaw! Except without the paycheck, and products to sell! lol Hopefully you have better hair! And eyesight!
And OF COURSE you'll continue to call him by the ill-fitting moniker you're pleading for everyone to embrace. It's what Hacksaw-- and Cliff Claven-- would do!
"Straight into the iceberg, Cap'n!!!! Full speed ahead!" lolol
Comment