I think this is somewhat skewing the facts concerning wide receivers. Probably most of them are taken in the late first round like we took QJ. I have a weird feeling that after this years draft those numbers are going to drastically change to like 30% for first and 30% for second rounders. LOL!
2024 Chargers News | Acquisitions | Transactions | Injuries
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
Originally posted by sonorajim View Post
Teams that don't have a great WR, LT are desperate to find one and take more chances.
Also provides insight in how some teams continually invest in IOL and always have a good online. They're effectively taking on less draft capitol risk.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by gzubeck View PostI think this is somewhat skewing the facts concerning wide receivers. Probably most of them are taken in the late first round like we took QJ. I have a weird feeling that after this years draft those numbers are going to drastically change to like 30% for first and 30% for second rounders. LOL!
WRs are more often taken in R1 even if they are not superstar consensus locks. And of course, Al Davis single-handedly skewed their stat with his annual wacky over-draft of a doomed track star
“Less is more? NO NO NO - MORE is MORE!”
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dmac_bolt View Post
I don't think so - I think its far fewer OCs or TEs are ever taken in R1 due to "value". The R1 picks for these positions that are taken are just more likely to be evaluated to be extraordinary. OCs in particular - I'd guess most R1 OCs were taken late(r) in R1, not early.
WRs are more often taken in R1 even if they are not superstar consensus locks. And of course, Al Davis single-handedly skewed their stat with his annual wacky over-draft of a doomed track starChiefs won the Superbowl with 10 Rookies....
"Locked, Cocked, and ready to Rock!" Jim Harbaugh
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by dmac_bolt View Post
I'm not forgetting anything and I've said for coaches to work it out too. I'll trust their evaluations. I'm not a Pipkins fanboy, I'm just not a hysterical critic.
you are forgetting Pipkins played well at RT in 2022. He allowed 2 sacks in ~900 snaps. You're also forgetting he played better than Salyer and Zion (and Clapp) in 2023. Or, rather, you're ignoring it.
Replace every name not Mack is what this forum sounds like most days. I'm calmer than that.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by blueman View Post
Pip had a lot of help in 2022 that I recall. Any RT will look better with somebody chipping his guy. One on one, just haven’t seen it, but agree the coaches can work it out. The IOL was so dreadful in 2023 not sure Pip scaling out better is a reason to keep him lol. (And that last was a joke, I say, a joke 😎).“Less is more? NO NO NO - MORE is MORE!”
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Xenos View Post
But it is a restructure though. You just described what a restructure is in the following sentence.
it's a one time RPRCRR or "retirement pay reduction cap relief restructure""The author assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this post. The information contained in this post is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness..."
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by blueman View Post
You seem to be forgetting Salyer’s much better play at LT the year before, when Slater was injured. I mean even Slater looked pretty bad at times last season, and Zion was about equally bad as Salyer was.
Im willing to let the new coaches work this out, Salyer was great at RT at college, and has position flexibility. If he’s only good for a backup so be it.
Seriously, there’s only one player last season who played lights out (and it wasn’t Herbert..). Replace everyone not named Mack lol."The author assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this post. The information contained in this post is provided on an "as is" basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy, usefulness or timeliness..."
-
👍 2
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by blueman View Post
I’m sure both did. Coaches will sort it out, hopefully for the better.“Less is more? NO NO NO - MORE is MORE!”
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Fouts2herbert View Post
and why are you selectively forgetting or leaving out the part about how pipkins played much better in 2022 as well? so one guy gets a pass for 2023 but the other doesn't? pipkin's critics agree that the whole line had a down year in 2023 but at the same time it's become a fantastic opportunity to single out the guy they don't like and everyone else get's a pass, LOL...
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment