Originally posted by northerner
View Post
MIke Williams Is Out Against The Jags
Collapse
X
-
Interesting take. The decision to play Mike does seem at odds with his overall philosophy of taking care of his players. I would actually prefer this to be the case (rather than it being his decision), but why would Ownership (and who else could dictate this kind of thing to an NFL head coach) do such a thing? And why would Staley allow it anyway?
But the only time I recall that happening in semi-recent history is when they had bye weeks. In '09 they played washington the final week and Norv took the starters out after about 1 series. I don't recall what they did the final week in '06.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Trumpet Man View Post
That was me.
Mike needs "another" MRI and "further" testing to find a broken back ?
What the fuck happened the first time around and not catching it ?
Yeah not a good look at all ......
Next man up
Playoffs
BTFU
This was likely a result of his agent (and family) not wanting Mike to play and talking Mike into getting a 2nd opinion. A lot of this type of shit goes on in the NFL there's a natural conflict between agents and team. He could get a 3rd MRI that might not show anything.
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jox g View Post
Unfortunate!
All good tho. I want to stay realistically positive because it is what it is.
What's better this time around vs the jags?
*Herbert 100 pct healthy
*2 LB's are playing better vs the run
*Gillman is better than who we used last time. A guy named NAS
*Josh Palmer + Parham = One Mike Dub!?! (Gonna email em now to USE 6'8" PARHAM MORE). Catch % is very high w/ him. Plus, can draw flags.
*Corey LInsely in this time.
*Parham in this time.
*"Revenge"
*This team is resiliant.
*If Staley loses, chance for a better coach next season!!!
*If Bolts win, Staley and staff progress
*Still a win win
*Playing starters last week increases chances of WINNING. (Stats show when teams rest starters b4 Wildcard, the winning percentage is only .333). Let's have courage. I choose to.The choice is yours.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Trumpet Man View Post
That was me.
Mike needs "another" MRI and "further" testing to find a broken back ?
What the fuck happened the first time around and not catching it ?
Yeah not a good look at all ......
Next man up
Playoffs
BTFU
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bolt-O View Post
I think they just missed it because it was tiny crack in a transverse process in the x-ray at the stadium, just enough to cause back spasms by nerve inflammation. MRI's are good for soft tissue, they didn't find anything, so they did another x-ray with a better machine and found the fracture. Unfortunate, I wish Mike was more durable.
MW's past durability issues make the decision to play him (at all) in a meaningless game all the more frustrating.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bolt-O View Post
I think they just missed it because it was tiny crack in a transverse process in the x-ray at the stadium, just enough to cause back spasms by nerve inflammation. MRI's are good for soft tissue, they didn't find anything, so they did another x-ray with a better machine and found the fracture. Unfortunate, I wish Mike was more durable.
I just have to wonder if that NFL purchased stadium equipment was made in C-h-i-n-a.
We have the internet to get different doctors opinions on MRI's and artificial intelligence to sort all that noise out - yet - a tiny hairline back fracture gets by everybody until ..................man oh man....not a good look at all.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Trumpet Man View Post
The stadiums are equipped with state-of-the-art equipment I have read.
I just have to wonder if that NFL purchased stadium equipment was made in C-h-i-n-a.
We have the internet to get different doctors opinions on MRI's and artificial intelligence to sort all that noise out - yet - a tiny hairline back fracture gets by everybody until ..................man oh man....not a good look at all.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Kellyb72601 View PostThis is why I really don't think it was his call. Staley is so tuned into sports science it really makes no sense. This is the field I've been in for nearly 30 years so I see the things he does from a little different perspective. He never practices on wednesdays, never plays his guys in pre-season, and is very cognizant of reps and snap counts. Then as you mentioned note how pissed off he was after that Denver game. He has to know the physical benefits of a week off otherwise he wouldn't implement all the other recovery oriented things he normally does throughout a season. The decision to play starters so long last week is totally incongruent with his decisions the last 2 years. The only logical explanation to me is it wasn't his call.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment