Originally posted by QSmokey
View Post
Apparently, missing one offensive player matters... and missing multiple offensive players isn't a consideration. You need to make up your mind on this one.
My explanation of the Chiefs loss to the Colts is... the Chiefs were going through an offensive slog at the beginning of the year. After all, they had just come off an underwhelming offensive showing against us the week before. If it weren't for the 14-point swing (pick-6 by their rookie CB) we had outplayed them.
Indy is not the Chiefs, Bengals or Bills... everyone knows that despite your insinuation. But every team is vulnerable (both KC and Cinci have defenses that can be exploited and Bills OL will have a hard time handling Mack, Bosa, and Fox).
My narrative has always been: Multiple/Impactful player injuries have limited what we can do offensively/defensively... the world is not ending... we will get most of those players back and make the playoffs. If/when healthy, we can compete with anyone.
This is exactly what has happened... this is not a controversial statement. Next, please.
Comment