Big boards are not objective. Aggregating opinions does not transform them into objective fact, so consensus boards are not objective. There is no external validation of these opinions available for years.
If you have a big pile of shit, adding more shit to the pile will not transform the shit into non-shit once a certain shit pile size threshold is reached. You just end up with a bigger pile of shit.
If you're a mathematician, opinions, like shit, are a closed set under addition.
If you have a big pile of shit, adding more shit to the pile will not transform the shit into non-shit once a certain shit pile size threshold is reached. You just end up with a bigger pile of shit.
If you're a mathematician, opinions, like shit, are a closed set under addition.
Comment