He is the best de for our scheme we have until proven otherwise. Pay him as such.
Official Chargers News - Injury Updates
Collapse
X
-
Liuget is our highest paid by a wide margin. He has a cap # of just shy of $5.5 million this year. The next highest is Reyes at about $1.3 million. Lissemore is about $1.25. Unrein is about $875k, and Philon and Carrethers are both around $500 k. (http://overthecap.com/salary-cap/san-diego-chargers).
Liuget is due a big raise at the end of the season, and that is a lot for the a guy who in 4 seasons has produced (1, 7, 5.5, and 4.5 sacks - total of 18). It isn't even the sack total, since inside guys don't usually get the totals of edge players (although Watt does well splitting time). It is the number of plays he leaves on the field, and the number of big plays he allows, which is even worse for Reyes.
I agree, Liuget is ideal as a pass rushing DT in an even front, the ideal person for our pass rush line. One of the issues that I have is the number of big plays he allows, and that is tough to quantify, since the NFL will never keep stats on that, and even PFF won't do that, since they don'
t explain their grading system.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Steve View PostLiuget is our highest paid by a wide margin. He has a cap # of just shy of $5.5 million this year. The next highest is Reyes at about $1.3 million. Lissemore is about $1.25. Unrein is about $875k, and Philon and Carrethers are both around $500 k. (http://overthecap.com/salary-cap/san-diego-chargers).
Liuget is due a big raise at the end of the season, and that is a lot for the a guy who in 4 seasons has produced (1, 7, 5.5, and 4.5 sacks - total of 18). It isn't even the sack total, since inside guys don't usually get the totals of edge players (although Watt does well splitting time). It is the number of plays he leaves on the field, and the number of big plays he allows, which is even worse for Reyes.
I agree, Liuget is ideal as a pass rushing DT in an even front, the ideal person for our pass rush line. One of the issues that I have is the number of big plays he allows, and that is tough to quantify, since the NFL will never keep stats on that, and even PFF won't do that, since they don'
t explain their grading system.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
There is always a shortage of DL, especially those with the quickness to rush the passer. Liuget has great quickness, power and a closing burst and he is chasing in, particuarly since he seems to forget how to use it for long stretches. He's never going to get used like Watt, so he is never going to have that sort of production, but there is no reason that Liuget can't be a lot better then he is. BUt because of the shortage of good 3 technique players right now, he gets paid.
I just think bringing our DL in waves, even if that means not having any who are very special is probably a better strategy. We can probably get the same results by using Philon ($465k), Lissemore ($1.25m), Carrethers ($510k), Mathews ($920k) Polepoi ($510k) and Unrein ($875k) to get about the same number of sacks/pressures and not give up the big plays to boot. And all of those guys together costs less ($4.530 m) what we pay for Liuget ($5.477 m).
If Liuget was even showing any progress, I would be OK with it. But it just seems to be the same thing. A few good games (although he production is uneven) followed by bad games where he allows a lot of yards. And don't even get me started on Reyes.
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Steve View PostThere is always a shortage of DL, especially those with the quickness to rush the passer. Liuget has great quickness, power and a closing burst and he is chasing in, particuarly since he seems to forget how to use it for long stretches. He's never going to get used like Watt, so he is never going to have that sort of production, but there is no reason that Liuget can't be a lot better then he is. BUt because of the shortage of good 3 technique players right now, he gets paid.
I just think bringing our DL in waves, even if that means not having any who are very special is probably a better strategy. We can probably get the same results by using Philon ($465k), Lissemore ($1.25m), Carrethers ($510k), Mathews ($920k) Polepoi ($510k) and Unrein ($875k) to get about the same number of sacks/pressures and not give up the big plays to boot. And all of those guys together costs less ($4.530 m) what we pay for Liuget ($5.477 m).
If Liuget was even showing any progress, I would be OK with it. But it just seems to be the same thing. A few good games (although he production is uneven) followed by bad games where he allows a lot of yards. And don't even get me started on Reyes.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Same as Liuget only not as good and more inconsistent. On paper, he is the ideal SDE for our D. He can play on the edge, get around people, and then slide inside in the nickle and play DT. But he just keeps doing the same thing, using bad technique, trying to make plays and leaving holes in our D, that allow teams to run through them (see last year's SF, and the year before vs Washington).
When he plays well, he can flash the same type of ability as a poor man's JJ Watt. He will never have the same type of production, because the Texans let Watt play like a 43 DE, but Reyes can be a whole lot more productive then he is. And there is no reason he should dip his shoulder and try and slip blocks like he tend to. He needs to focus on playing stout and square and using his hands better.
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Steve View PostSame as Liuget only not as good and more inconsistent. On paper, he is the ideal SDE for our D. He can play on the edge, get around people, and then slide inside in the nickle and play DT. But he just keeps doing the same thing, using bad technique, trying to make plays and leaving holes in our D, that allow teams to run through them (see last year's SF, and the year before vs Washington).
When he plays well, he can flash the same type of ability as a poor man's JJ Watt. He will never have the same type of production, because the Texans let Watt play like a 43 DE, but Reyes can be a whole lot more productive then he is. And there is no reason he should dip his shoulder and try and slip blocks like he tend to. He needs to focus on playing stout and square and using his hands better.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
IMO, I think the Chargers don't prioritize DL all that much because they seem to believe that the best DL is a fresh DL, and that it's pretty much a waste to spend high draft picks on a position that they want to rotate bodies into. Also, most of the time only two DL are on the field due to the spread out nature of today's NFL offenses.Prediction:
Correct: Chargers CI fails miserably.
Fail: Team stays in San Diego until their lease runs out in 2020. (without getting new deal done by then) .
Sig Bet WIN: The Chargers will file for relocation on January 15.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by KNSD View PostIMO, I think the Chargers don't prioritize DL all that much because they seem to believe that the best DL is a fresh DL, and that it's pretty much a waste to spend high draft picks on a position that they want to rotate bodies into. Also, most of the time only two DL are on the field due to the spread out nature of today's NFL offenses.
I don't think Pags will pull a Bud Black and just keep swapping guys at an alarming rate. There will be a method to his madness and he'll let players ride out a entire game if he's looking like a stud. Game planning and match ups will definitely have a say in this too.
- Top
- Bottom
Comment
-
Comment