Originally posted by equivocation
View Post
Welcome JT Woods, DB, Baylor (R3, #79)
Collapse
X
-
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
-
-
Originally posted by Cdn Bolt View PostI hope this pick works out. Staley had input into the S's they had last year too though but hope it works this time. I don't get what they do 1/2 the time but I'll drink the kool aid again.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by Cdn Bolt View PostMaybe S was a need area even though it seems we draft 1 every year. I would have thought RT was a bigger need area give we have had disastrous play there for a few years. ILB as well given Kenneth Murray has been inconsistent and hurt a lot.
I am near BUF so hear a lot of their trade discussions . They basically loaded up in FA and added a luxury RB ( James Cook, Dalvin Cook's brother) pick in rnd 2 to an already loaded O who may even start. It seems they are loading up for the SB while we still have needs to plug.
The Bills have holes to fill also especially at OL.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by blueman View Post
Why he’s a HC, and we’re not.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by ghost View Post
Next rep INT for #12, but Woods had the route jumped too, pulls up and screens the WR so his teammate gets the ball. Very heads up play, lots of times you see DBs collide there. Long time in coverage too.
So far he's had 4 good to great snaps and 2 okay snaps.
This is #8 OU @ #12 Baylor. Big time college football, gtfo with this Pipkins shit.
-
👍 2
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by Xenos View Post
In that scenario, could we please trade up to #75 (as HOU actually did) and take the #44 consensus ranked player instead of the #137 consensus ranked player, a player ranked f@&$ing 93 players lower? As a newsflash, taking the better player, you know, the one ranked 93 players ahead of the other player, does not prevent us from going after the worse player with a later pick.
Telesco's draft strategy is just off in this scenario. It is a case study in how not to conduct a draft.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by ghost View Post
-
👍 1
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
-
Guest repliedOriginally posted by Scott Green View Post
How would a ten yard split mean on many plays he would get there first? The forty is the standard of fast. Ten yard split matters or they wouldn't measure it but its not the forty. Plus. Mager was a small school project. Woods is a D1 full timer that played in real conference title games and real bowl games vs real talent. They never saw Mager vs anyone good.
Your implied suggestion by citing the article you cited that Woods would somehow be two feet ahead of Mager all the time is just wrong. Mager was faster initially and on most plays Woods would not have the chance to run 40 yards in a straight line to catch and pass Mager.
To be clear, my discussion has nothing to do with who is a better player. I have simply indicated my opposition to your suggestion that Woods is significantly faster than Mager was because his 40 time was .08 seconds faster. I do not think that is true, especially in light of Mager's faster 10 yard split time, regardless of the ability of either player on the field.
- Top
- Bottom
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment: